This is what happens when Meshmixer does just that: you are left with the cone half and some inverted artifact areas. Or even no more outer shell as the easiest solution is to just stitch that lower surface and discard the rest. This solution leads to two intersecting and manifold shells - a cylinder overlapping the drilled holes and the body with the drilled holes - which then promptly get treated with a boolean union. In the following picture, I have hidden part of the geometry to better show the problematic internal surfaces in orange:Īutomatic processes such as Meshmixer or Windows 10 3D builder interpret such an internal, one-sided open cylinder as "This probably is missing a surface on both ends". STL for 3D printing.Ĭhanges are only made to the original bodies (1,2,3) so that they are reflected in all the 3D prints.The body you modeled consists of a non-manifold shell: There exists a fully enclosed shell on the inside of the item that tries to define an "outside" of the body. Using Make 3D print, I selected either "right-side part" or "left-side part" to export to.
You can rename them into whatever name you want the 3d file to be. I renamed Component 1 to "right-side part", and Component 2 to "left-side part". copy and pasted Body 2 and Body 3 into Component 2. I then copied and pasted Body 1 and Body 2 into Component 1, I assembled two New and empty components. using construct offset planes, I marked the locations to separate the bodies, turned the timeline back on and confirmed I was now in model mode, went to patch mode and modified the mesh to BRep,
Yes, the middle section will belong to both of the new parts. STL file which contained an object which needed to be split into two parts - roughly the right 2/3s and the left 2/3s. Let me tell you a solution to a very similar problem which has worked for me.
0 kommentar(er)
